-
Signature
-
/s/ Charlotte M. Rasche, as Attorney in Fact
-
Issuer symbol
-
PB
-
Transactions as of
-
18 Jun 2025
-
Transactions value $
-
-$74,480
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
18 Jun 2025, 17:23:39 UTC
Reporting Owners (1)
| Name |
Relationship |
Address |
Signature |
Signature date |
CIK |
| HOLMES NED S |
Director |
80 SUGAR CREEK CENTER BLVD., SUGAR LAND |
/s/ Charlotte M. Rasche, as Attorney in Fact |
18 Jun 2025 |
0001136856 |
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
PB |
Common Stock |
Sale |
-$33,854 |
-500 |
-0.5% |
$67.71 |
99,415 |
18 Jun 2025 |
Direct |
F1 |
| transaction |
PB |
Common Stock |
Sale |
-$33,853 |
-500 |
-0.43% |
$67.71 |
116,693 |
18 Jun 2025 |
By profit sharing plan |
F2 |
| transaction |
PB |
Common Stock |
Sale |
-$334 |
-5 |
-0.01% |
$66.84 |
45,395 |
18 Jun 2025 |
As trustee of SSH trust for adult daughter |
|
| transaction |
PB |
Common Stock |
Sale |
-$6,437 |
-95 |
-0.21% |
$67.77 |
45,300 |
18 Jun 2025 |
As trustee of SSH trust for adult daughter |
F3 |
| holding |
PB |
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
18 Jun 2025 |
By spouse |
|
| holding |
PB |
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
8,820 |
18 Jun 2025 |
As trustee of granchildren's trust |
|
| holding |
PB |
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
3,720 |
18 Jun 2025 |
By trust |
|
| holding |
PB |
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
70,070 |
18 Jun 2025 |
By limited partnership |
|
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: