-
Signature
-
By: POA Pursuant Liz Ramirez For: John Frederick Runkel, Jr.
-
Issuer symbol
-
SNPS
-
Transactions as of
-
10 Jun 2024
-
Net transactions value
-
-$267,467
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
12 Jun 2024, 10:54:34 UTC
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
SNPS |
Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$129,740 |
+366 |
+1.8% |
$354.48 |
20,366 |
10 Jun 2024 |
Direct |
|
| transaction |
SNPS |
Common Stock |
Sale |
$207,511 |
-366 |
-1.8% |
$566.97 |
20,000 |
10 Jun 2024 |
Direct |
|
| transaction |
SNPS |
Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$133,477 |
+570 |
+2.8% |
$234.17 |
20,570 |
10 Jun 2024 |
Direct |
|
| transaction |
SNPS |
Common Stock |
Sale |
$323,173 |
-570 |
-2.8% |
$566.97 |
20,000 |
10 Jun 2024 |
Direct |
|
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
SNPS |
Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-570 |
-33% |
$0.000000 |
1,139 |
10 Jun 2024 |
Common Stock |
570 |
$234.17 |
Direct |
F1, F2 |
| transaction |
SNPS |
Non-Qualified Stock Option (right to buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-366 |
-14% |
$0.000000 |
2,197 |
10 Jun 2024 |
Common Stock |
366 |
$354.48 |
Direct |
F1, F2 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: