-
Signature
-
/s/ Kate Pytlewski as Attorney-in-Fact
-
Issuer symbol
-
EPAM
-
Transactions as of
-
01 Dec 2023
-
Transactions value $
-
-$1,607,844
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
04 Dec 2023, 16:20:15 UTC
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
EPAM |
EPAM Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$64.9K |
+2.02K |
+29.74% |
$32.08* |
8.82K |
01 Dec 2023 |
Direct |
|
| transaction |
EPAM |
EPAM Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$434K |
+6.15K |
+69.77% |
$70.52 |
15K |
01 Dec 2023 |
Direct |
|
| transaction |
EPAM |
EPAM Common Stock |
Sale |
-$760K |
-3K |
-20.03% |
$253.35 |
12K |
01 Dec 2023 |
Direct |
F1 |
| transaction |
EPAM |
EPAM Common Stock |
Sale |
-$1.35M |
-5.18K |
-43.22% |
$260.17 |
6.8K |
01 Dec 2023 |
Direct |
F2 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
EPAM |
Employee Stock Option (right to buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-2.02K |
-100% |
$0.00* |
0 |
01 Dec 2023 |
EPAM Common Stock |
2.02K |
$32.08 |
Direct |
F3 |
| transaction |
EPAM |
Employee Stock Option (right to buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-6.15K |
-100% |
$0.00* |
0 |
01 Dec 2023 |
EPAM Common Stock |
6.15K |
$70.52 |
Direct |
F4 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: