-
Signature
-
/s/ Alexandra Cotter Wilkins, Attorney-in-Fact
-
Stock symbol
-
HIMS
-
Transactions as of
-
Jan 21, 2025
-
Transactions value $
-
-$402,782
-
Form type
-
4
-
Date filed
-
1/23/2025, 04:32 PM
Transactions Table
Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
transaction |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$729 |
+300 |
+1.07% |
$2.43 |
28.2K |
Jan 21, 2025 |
Direct |
F1 |
transaction |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
-$9K |
-300 |
-1.06% |
$30.00 |
27.9K |
Jan 21, 2025 |
Direct |
F1 |
transaction |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$34.7K |
+14.3K |
+51.11% |
$2.43 |
42.2K |
Jan 22, 2025 |
Direct |
F1 |
transaction |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
-$429K |
-14.3K |
-33.82% |
$30.08 |
27.9K |
Jan 22, 2025 |
Direct |
F1, F2 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
transaction |
HIMS |
Stock Option (right to buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-300 |
-0.02% |
$0.00 |
1.55M |
Jan 21, 2025 |
Class A Common Stock |
300 |
$2.43 |
Direct |
F1, F3 |
transaction |
HIMS |
Stock Option (right to buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-14.3K |
-0.92% |
$0.00 |
1.53M |
Jan 22, 2025 |
Class A Common Stock |
14.3K |
$2.43 |
Direct |
F1, F3 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: