CHICAGO RIVET & MACHINE CO Quarterly Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit) in USD from Q1 2011 to Q3 2024

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
Amount of deferred income tax expense (benefit) pertaining to income (loss) from continuing operations.
Summary
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co annual/quarterly Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit) history and growth rate from Q1 2011 to Q3 2024.
  • Chicago Rivet & Machine Co Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit) for the quarter ending September 30, 2024 was $651K.
  • Chicago Rivet & Machine Co annual Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit) for 2024 was $563K.
  • Chicago Rivet & Machine Co annual Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit) for 2023 was -$1.27M, a 5886% decline from 2022.
  • Chicago Rivet & Machine Co annual Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit) for 2022 was $22K.
Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit), Quarterly (USD)
Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit), YoY Quarterly Growth (%)
Period TTM Value Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
Q3 2024 $651K Jul 1, 2024 Sep 30, 2024 10-Q 2024-11-12
Q1 2024 -$177K -$134K -311% Jan 1, 2024 Mar 31, 2024 10-Q 2024-05-10
Q1 2023 -$43K -$19K -79.2% Jan 1, 2023 Mar 31, 2023 10-Q 2024-05-10
Q1 2022 -$24K +$7K +22.6% Jan 1, 2022 Mar 31, 2022 10-Q 2023-05-08
Q1 2021 -$31K -$7K -29.2% Jan 1, 2021 Mar 31, 2021 10-Q 2022-05-06
Q1 2020 -$24K -$48K -200% Jan 1, 2020 Mar 31, 2020 10-Q 2021-05-07
Q1 2019 $24K +$38K Jan 1, 2019 Mar 31, 2019 10-Q 2020-05-08
Q1 2018 -$14K +$3K +17.6% Jan 1, 2018 Mar 31, 2018 10-Q 2019-05-08
Q1 2017 -$17K -$9K -113% Jan 1, 2017 Mar 31, 2017 10-Q 2018-05-04
Q1 2016 -$8K +$16K +66.7% Jan 1, 2016 Mar 31, 2016 10-Q 2017-05-05
Q1 2015 -$24K -$31K -443% Jan 1, 2015 Mar 31, 2015 10-Q 2016-05-05
Q1 2014 $7K +$91K Jan 1, 2014 Mar 31, 2014 10-Q 2015-05-06
Q1 2013 -$84K -$70K -500% Jan 1, 2013 Mar 31, 2013 10-Q 2014-05-09
Q1 2012 -$14K +$17K +54.8% Jan 1, 2012 Mar 31, 2012 10-Q 2013-05-10
Q1 2011 -$31K Jan 1, 2011 Mar 31, 2011 10-Q 2012-05-04
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.