INTERPARFUMS INC Quarterly Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit) in USD from Q1 2011 to Q1 2024

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
Amount of deferred income tax expense (benefit) pertaining to income (loss) from continuing operations.
Summary
Interparfums Inc annual/quarterly Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit) history and growth rate from Q1 2011 to Q1 2024.
  • Interparfums Inc Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit) for the quarter ending March 31, 2024 was -$1.46M, a 23% decline year-over-year.
  • Interparfums Inc annual Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit) for 2024 was -$3.36M, a 12.4% decline from 2023.
  • Interparfums Inc annual Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit) for 2023 was -$2.99M, a 17.1% increase from 2022.
  • Interparfums Inc annual Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit) for 2022 was -$3.6M, a 675% decline from 2021.
Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit), Quarterly (USD)
Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit), YoY Quarterly Growth (%)
Period TTM Value Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
Q1 2024 -$1.46M -$273K -23% Jan 1, 2024 Mar 31, 2024 10-Q 2024-05-07
Q1 2023 -$1.19M -$1.32M -980% Jan 1, 2023 Mar 31, 2023 10-Q 2024-05-07
Q1 2022 $135K +$77K +133% Jan 1, 2022 Mar 31, 2022 10-Q 2023-05-08
Q1 2021 $58K +$521K Jan 1, 2021 Mar 31, 2021 10-Q 2022-05-10
Q1 2020 -$463K +$102K +18.1% Jan 1, 2020 Mar 31, 2020 10-Q 2021-05-10
Q1 2019 -$565K -$307K -119% Jan 1, 2019 Mar 31, 2019 10-Q 2020-05-11
Q1 2018 -$258K +$148K +36.5% Jan 1, 2018 Mar 31, 2018 10-Q 2019-05-06
Q1 2017 -$406K +$268K +39.8% Jan 1, 2017 Mar 31, 2017 10-Q 2018-05-08
Q1 2016 -$674K -$171K -34% Jan 1, 2016 Mar 31, 2016 10-Q 2017-05-09
Q1 2015 -$503K -$950K -213% Jan 1, 2015 Mar 31, 2015 10-Q 2016-05-10
Q1 2014 $447K -$5.82M -92.9% Jan 1, 2014 Mar 31, 2014 10-Q 2015-05-11
Q1 2013 $6.26M +$6.23M +20100% Jan 1, 2013 Mar 31, 2013 10-Q 2014-05-07
Q1 2012 $31K +$328K Jan 1, 2012 Mar 31, 2012 10-Q 2013-05-08
Q1 2011 -$297K Jan 1, 2011 Mar 31, 2011 10-Q 2012-05-09
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.