PLUMAS BANCORP Annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense in USD from 2013 to 2024

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
Amount of expense for award under share-based payment arrangement. Excludes amount capitalized.
Summary
Plumas Bancorp quarterly/annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense history and growth rate from 2013 to 2024.
  • Plumas Bancorp Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the quarter ending December 31, 2024 was $43K, a 25.9% decline year-over-year.
  • Plumas Bancorp Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the twelve months ending December 31, 2024 was $393K, a 23.6% increase year-over-year.
  • Plumas Bancorp annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2024 was $393K, a 23.6% increase from 2023.
  • Plumas Bancorp annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2023 was $318K, a 32% increase from 2022.
  • Plumas Bancorp annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2022 was $241K, a 8.07% increase from 2021.
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Annual (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2024 $393K +$75K +23.6% Jan 1, 2024 Dec 31, 2024 10-K 2025-03-19
2023 $318K +$77K +32% Jan 1, 2023 Dec 31, 2023 10-K 2025-03-19
2022 $241K +$18K +8.07% Jan 1, 2022 Dec 31, 2022 10-K 2024-03-20
2021 $223K -$32K -12.5% Jan 1, 2021 Dec 31, 2021 10-K 2024-03-20
2020 $255K +$31K +13.8% Jan 1, 2020 Dec 31, 2020 10-K 2023-03-16
2019 $224K +$25K +12.6% Jan 1, 2019 Dec 31, 2019 10-K 2022-03-17
2018 $199K +$47K +30.9% Jan 1, 2018 Dec 31, 2018 10-K 2021-03-03
2017 $152K +$36K +31% Jan 1, 2017 Dec 31, 2017 10-K 2020-03-05
2016 $116K +$46K +65.7% Jan 1, 2016 Dec 31, 2016 10-K 2019-03-07
2015 $70K -$11K -13.6% Jan 1, 2015 Dec 31, 2015 10-K 2018-03-12
2014 $81K +$43K +113% Jan 1, 2014 Dec 31, 2014 10-K 2017-03-17
2013 $38K Jan 1, 2013 Dec 31, 2013 10-K 2015-03-19
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.