Jaguar Health, Inc. Annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense in USD from 2014 to 2024

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
Amount of expense for award under share-based payment arrangement. Excludes amount capitalized.
Summary
Jaguar Health, Inc. quarterly/annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense history and growth rate from 2014 to 2024.
  • Jaguar Health, Inc. Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the quarter ending December 31, 2024 was $367K, a 36.4% decline year-over-year.
  • Jaguar Health, Inc. Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the twelve months ending December 31, 2024 was $1.64M, a 22.3% decline year-over-year.
  • Jaguar Health, Inc. annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2024 was $1.64M, a 22.3% decline from 2023.
  • Jaguar Health, Inc. annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2023 was $2.11M, a 36.3% decline from 2022.
  • Jaguar Health, Inc. annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2022 was $3.32M, a 16.5% decline from 2021.
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Annual (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2024 $1.64M -$471K -22.3% Jan 1, 2024 Dec 31, 2024 10-K 2025-03-31
2023 $2.11M -$1.21M -36.3% Jan 1, 2023 Dec 31, 2023 10-K 2025-03-31
2022 $3.32M -$656K -16.5% Jan 1, 2022 Dec 31, 2022 10-K 2024-04-01
2021 $3.97M +$1.15M +40.7% Jan 1, 2021 Dec 31, 2021 10-K 2023-03-24
2020 $2.82M -$165K -5.52% Jan 1, 2020 Dec 31, 2020 10-K 2022-03-11
2019 $2.99M +$965K +47.7% Jan 1, 2019 Dec 31, 2019 10-K 2021-03-31
2018 $2.02M +$1.21M +148% Jan 1, 2018 Dec 31, 2018 10-K 2020-04-03
2017 $815K +$96.7K +13.5% Jan 1, 2017 Dec 31, 2017 10-K 2019-04-10
2016 $718K -$274K -27.6% Jan 1, 2016 Dec 31, 2016 10-K 2018-04-09
2015 $992K +$828K +504% Jan 1, 2015 Dec 31, 2015 10-K 2017-02-15
2014 $164K Jan 1, 2014 Dec 31, 2014 10-K 2016-03-29
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.